AC(q)min at a market price of $6
At $6, the firm earns "normal economic profits"
At any market price below $6.00, firm earns losses
At any market price above $6.00, firm earns "supernormal profits"
Short run: firms that shut down (q∗=0) stuck in market, incur fixed costs π=−f
Long run: firms earning losses (π<0) can exit the market and earn π=0
Short run: firms that shut down (q∗=0) stuck in market, incur fixed costs π=−f
Long run: firms earning losses (π<0) can exit the market and earn π=0
Entrepreneurs not currently in market can enter and produce, if entry would earn them π>0
When p<AVC
Profits are negative
Short run: shut down production
Long run: firms in industry exit the industry
When AVC<p<AC
Profits are negative
Short run: continue production
Long run: firms in industry exit the industry
When AC<p
Profits are positive
Short run: continue production
Long run: firms in industry stay in industry
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Long-run equilibrium: entry and exit ceases when p=AC(q) for all firms, implying normal economic profits of π=0
Zero Profits Theorem: long run economic profits for all firms in a competitive industry are 0
Firms must earn an accounting profit to stay in business
Industry supply curve: sum of all individual firms' supply curves (MC(q) curve above AVCmin)
To keep it simple on the following slides:
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Long run industry equilibrium: p=AC(q)min, π=0 at p= $6; supply becomes more elastic
Recall, we've defined a firm as a completely replicable recipe (production function) of resources
Anyone can enter market, buy required factors, and produce q∗ at market price p and earn the market rate of π
Let's start considering some realistic differences between firms
"Inframarginal" (lower-cost) firms earn economic rents
Economic rents arise from relative differences between firms
Some factors are relatively scarce in the economy
Inframarginal firms that use these scarce factors gain a cost-advantage
It would seem these firms earn profits as other firms have higher costs...
Rival firms willing to pay for rent-generating factor to gain advantage
Competition over acquiring the scarce factors push up their prices
Rents are included in the opportunity cost (price) for inputs
Economic rents ≠ profits!
Firm does not earn the rents, they raise firm's costs and squeeze out profits!
Scarce factor owners (workers, landowners, inventors, etc) earn the rents as higher income for their scarce services (wages, rents, interest, royalties, etc).
Recall "economic" point of view:
Producing your product pulls scarce resources out of other productive uses in the economy
Profits attract resources to be pulled out of other uses
Losses repel resources to be pulled away to other uses
Zero profits ⟹ resources should stay where they are
Demand function measures how much you would hypothetically be willing to pay for various quantities
You often actually pay (the market-clearing price, p∗) a lot less than your reservation price
The difference is consumer surplus
CS=WTP−p∗
CS=12bhCS=12(5−0)($10−$5)CS=$12.50
Supply function measures how much you would hypothetically be willing to accept to sell various quantities
You often actually receive (the market-clearing price, p∗) a lot more than your reservation price
The difference is producer surplus
PS=p∗−WTA
Allocative efficiency: resources are allocated to highest-valued uses
All potential gains from trade are fully exhausted
Economic surplus = Consumer surplus + Producer surplus
Maximized in competitive equilibrium
Resources flow away from those who value them the lowest to those that value them the highest
The social value of resources is maximized by allocating them to their highest valued uses!
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |