Agents have objectives they value
Agents face constraints
Make tradeoffs to maximize objectives within constraints
Agents have objectives they value
Agents face constraints
Make tradeoffs to maximize objectives within constraints
Agents compete with others over scarce resources
Agents adjust behaviors based on prices
Stable outcomes when adjustments stop
If people can learn and change their behavior, they will always switch to a higher-valued option
If there are no alternatives that are better, people are at an optimum
If everyone is at an optimum, the system is in equilibrium
Choose: < some alternative >
In order to maximize: < some objective >
Choose: < some alternative >
In order to maximize: < some objective >
Subject to: < some constraints >
Firm is a mere production process:
Synonymous with production function
Fully replicable
We'll explore (and explode) this much later
Assume "firm" is agent to model:
So what do firms do?
How would we set up an optimization model:
Choose: < some alternative >
In order to maximize: < some objective >
Subject to: < some constraints >
Firms convert some goods to other goods:
Inputs: x1,x2,⋯,xn
Firms convert some goods to other goods:
Inputs: x1,x2,⋯,xn
Output: q
The production function
The production algorithm
q=f(t,l,k,e,a)
Factor | Owned By | Earns |
---|---|---|
Land (t) | Landowners | Rent |
Labor (l) | Laborers | Wages |
Capital (k) | Capitalists | Interest |
Entrepreneurship (e) | Entrepreneurs | Profit |
q=f(l,k)
Factor | Owned By | Earns |
---|---|---|
Labor (l) | Laborers | Wages |
Capital (k) | Capitalists | Interest |
We will assume firms maximize profit (π)
Not true for all firms
Even profit-seeking firms may also want to maximize additional things
In economics, profit is simply benefits minus (opportunity) costs
Suppose a firm sells output q at a price p
In economics, profit is simply benefits minus (opportunity) costs
Suppose a firm sells output q at a price p
In economics, profit is simply benefits minus (opportunity) costs
Suppose a firm sells output q at a price p
It can buy each input xi at an associated price pi
The profit of selling q units and using inputs l,k is: π=pq⏟revenues−(wl+rk)⏟costs
π=pq⏟revenues−(wl+rk)⏟costs
The firm's costs are all of the factor-owner's incomes!
Profits are the residual value leftover after paying all factors
π=pq⏟revenues−(wl+rk)⏟costs
π=pq⏟revenues−(wl+rk)⏟costs
Residual claimants have incentives to maximize firm's profits, as this maximizes their own income
Entrepreneurs and shareholders are the only participants in production that are not guaranteed an income!
Choose: < some alternative >
In order to maximize: < profits >
Subject to: < technology >
What do firms choose? (Not an easy answer)
Prices?
Essential question: how competitive is a market? This will influence what firms (can) do
The "time"-frame of production can be usefully divided between short vs. long run analysis
Short run: at least one factor of production is fixed* (too costly to change) q=f(ˉk,l)
The "time"-frame of production can be usefully divided between short vs. long run analysis
Long run: all factors of production are variable q=f(k,l)
Marginal product of an input is the additional output produced by one more unit of that input (holding other inputs constant)
Like marginal utility
Marginal product of labor (MPl): additional output produced by adding one more unit of labor (holding k constant) MPl=ΔqΔl
MPl is the slope of TP at every value of l!
Note: via calculus: ∂q∂l
Marginal product of capital (MPk): additional output produced by adding one more unit of capital (holding l constant) MPk=ΔqΔk
MPk is the slope of TP at every value of k!
Note: via calculus: ∂q∂k
Law of Diminishing Returns: adding more of one factor of production holding others constant will result in successively lower increases in output
In order to increase output, firm will need to increase all factors!
Law of Diminishing Returns: adding more of one factor of production holding others constant will result in successively lower increases in output1
In order to increase output, firm will need to increase all factors!
Average product of labor (APl): total output per worker APl=ql
A measure of labor productivity
Average product of capital (APk): total output per unit of capital APk=qk
q=f(k,l)
Can build more factories, open more storefronts, rent more space, invest in machines, etc.
So the firm can choose both l and k
Based on what we've discussed, we can fill in a constrained optimization model for the firm
The firm's problem is:
Choose: < inputs and output >
In order to maximize: < profits >
Subject to: < technology >
Costs in economics are different from common conception of "cost"
This leads to the difference between
Social implications: are consumers best off with you using scarce resources (with alternative uses!) to produce your current product?
Remember: this is an economics course, not a business course!
Examples:
Opportunity cost is a forward-looking concept
Choices made in the past with non-recoverable costs are called sunk costs
Sunk costs should not enter into future decisions
Many people have difficulty letting go of unchangeable past decisions: sunk cost fallacy
Licensing fees, long-term lease contracts
Specific capital (with no alternative use): uniforms, menus, signs
Research & Development spending
Advertising spending
C(q)=f+VC(q)
C(q)=f+VC(q)
1. Fixed costs, f are costs that do not vary with output
C(q)=f+VC(q)
1. Fixed costs, f are costs that do not vary with output
2. Variable costs, VC(q) are costs that vary with output (notice the variable in them!)
What is the difference between fixed and sunk costs?
Sunk costs are a type of fixed cost that are not avoidable or recoverable
Many fixed costs can be avoided or changed in the long run
Common fixed, but not sunk, costs:
When deciding to stay in business, fixed costs matter, sunk costs do not!
Example: Suppose your firm has the following total cost function:
C(q)=q2+q+10
Write a function for the fixed costs, f.
Write a function for the variable costs, VC(q).
q | f | VC(q) | C(q) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
1 | 10 | 2 | 12 |
2 | 10 | 6 | 16 |
3 | 10 | 12 | 22 |
4 | 10 | 20 | 30 |
5 | 10 | 30 | 40 |
6 | 10 | 42 | 52 |
7 | 10 | 56 | 66 |
8 | 10 | 72 | 82 |
9 | 10 | 90 | 100 |
10 | 10 | 110 | 120 |
AFC(q)=fq
AFC(q)=fq
AVC(q)=VC(q)q
AFC(q)=fq
AVC(q)=VC(q)q
AC(q)=C(q)q
MC(q)=ΔC(q)Δq
Calculus: first derivative of the cost function
Marginal cost is the primary cost that matters in making decisions
q | C(q) | MC(q) | AFC(q) | AVC(q) | AC(q) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 10 | − | − | − | − |
1 | 12 | 2 | 10.00 | 2 | 12.00 |
2 | 16 | 4 | 5.00 | 3 | 8.00 |
3 | 22 | 6 | 3.33 | 4 | 7.30 |
4 | 30 | 8 | 2.50 | 5 | 7.50 |
5 | 40 | 10 | 2.00 | 6 | 8.00 |
6 | 52 | 12 | 1.67 | 7 | 8.70 |
7 | 66 | 14 | 1.43 | 8 | 9.40 |
8 | 82 | 16 | 1.25 | 9 | 10.25 |
9 | 100 | 18 | 1.11 | 10 | 11.10 |
10 | 120 | 20 | 1.00 | 11 | 12.00 |
Relationship between a marginal and an average value:
Whenever marginal > average, average is increasing
Relationship between a marginal and an average value:
Whenever marginal > average, average is increasing
Whenever marginal < average, average is decreasing
Relationship between a marginal and an average value:
Whenever marginal > average, average is increasing
Whenever marginal < average, average is decreasing
When marginal = average, average is maximized/minimized
When MC=AVC, AVC is at a minimum
Economic importance (later):
Example: Suppose a firm's cost structure is described by: C(q)=15q2+8q+45MC(q)=30q+8
Write expressions for the firm's fixed costs, variable costs, average fixed costs, average variable costs, and average (total) costs.
Find the minimum average (total) cost.
Find the minimum average variable cost.
In the long run, firm can change all factors of production, and vary the scale of production
Long run average cost, LRAC(q): cost per unit of output when the firm can change both l and k to make more q
Long run marginal cost, LRMC(q): change in long run total cost as the firm produce an additional unit of q (by changing both l and/or k)
In the long run, firm can choose k (factories, locations, etc)
Separate short run average cost (SRAC) curves for each amount of k potentially chosen
In the long run, firm can choose k (factories, locations, etc)
Separate short run average cost (SRAC) curves for each amount of k potentially chosen
Long run average cost (LRAC) curve "envelopes" the lowest (optimal) parts of all the SRAC curves!
Further properties about costs based on scale economies of production:
Economies of scale: costs fall with output
Diseconomies of scale: costs rise with output
Constant economies of scale: costs don't change with output
Note economies of scale ≠ returns to scale!
Minimum Efficient Scale: q with the lowest AC(q)
Economies of Scale: ↑q, ↓AC(q)
Diseconomies of Scale: ↑q, ↑AC(q)
Demand for a firm's product is perfectly elastic at the market price
Where did the supply curve come from? You'll see
Average Revenue: revenue per unit of output AR(q)=Rq
Marginal Revenue: change in revenues for each additional unit of output sold: MR(q)=ΔR(q)Δq≈R2−R1q2−q1
Example: A firm sells bushels of wheat in a very competitive market. The current market price is $10/bushel.
Example: A firm sells bushels of wheat in a very competitive market. The current market price is $10/bushel.
For the 1st bushel sold:
What is the total revenue?
What is the average revenue?
Example: A firm sells bushels of wheat in a very competitive market. The current market price is $10/bushel.
For the 1st bushel sold:
What is the total revenue?
What is the average revenue?
For the 2nd bushel sold:
What is the total revenue?
What is the average revenue?
What is the marginal revenue?
q | R(q) |
---|---|
0 | 0 |
1 | 10 |
2 | 20 |
3 | 30 |
4 | 40 |
5 | 50 |
6 | 60 |
7 | 70 |
8 | 80 |
9 | 90 |
10 | 100 |
q | R(q) | AR(q) | MR(q) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | − | − |
1 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
2 | 20 | 10 | 10 |
3 | 30 | 10 | 10 |
4 | 40 | 10 | 10 |
5 | 50 | 10 | 10 |
6 | 60 | 10 | 10 |
7 | 70 | 10 | 10 |
8 | 80 | 10 | 10 |
9 | 90 | 10 | 10 |
10 | 100 | 10 | 10 |
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |